Max Mautner

Essay · TRANSPORTATION

The Bay Area will pay more to bail out America's highways than to keep its own trains and buses running

On Nov. 3, voters in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties decide on a 14-year sales tax to keep BART, Muni, Caltrain and AC Transit running. Their federal income taxes also bail out the nation’s highways, and from 2028 the Bay Area’s share of that bill will be bigger than anything the transit tax would raise.

The tax is half a cent on the dollar, a full cent in San Francisco, and most of the money would go to running the 4 agencies. SPUR estimates it would cost someone earning up to 80% of the area’s median income $7 a month.

Since 2008 the federal government has spent more from the Highway Trust Fund than it collects in gas and truck taxes. Congress has refilled the fund from general revenue 10 times instead of raising the federal gas tax, and the Congressional Budget Office projects the highway account will run dry again in 2028.

Bar chart, per year: the Bay Area's share of bailing out the federal highway fund, $1.27 billion, against $980 million raised by the Nov. 3 transit sales tax. Since 2008 the Bay Area has already put ~$10 billion into highway bailouts, more than 10 years of the transit tax.

Most general federal revenue comes from income taxes, so I assigned the Bay Area a share of each transfer, and of CBO’s projected shortfall through 2036, equal to its share of federal income tax that year in IRS county data. Congress borrowed most of the money, so this is a share of the debt Bay Area taxpayers carry.

Congress also pays for new trains, buses and stations from the trust fund’s transit account. It put $60 billion of its general-fund transfers into that account, and Bay Area agencies receive part of the money. I left the transit account out of the charts, which count only highway money.

A gas tax would spread the same bill by driving instead. Kansas City has 3 times as much road per resident as Los Angeles, and each time Congress refills the fund from general revenue, it moves part of the cost of roads like Kansas City’s onto counties that drive less and earn more.

Bar chart: the 5 Bay Area counties do 1.3% of America's driving, and so pay ~1.3% of the gas tax, have 1.8% of its people, and pay 5.2% of its income taxes, and so of the highway bailouts

California receives less than its population share of federal highway formula funds, according to FHWA, and the Bay Area’s share of the highway bailouts is ~3 times its share of the population.

None of the 10 transfers went to a Bay Area ballot. Congress has extended the current highway law to Dec. 11 and will likely extend it again, but it has to decide on the next transfer before the highway account runs dry in 2028: another transfer from the general fund, or a gas tax or per-mile fee that charges drivers for highways. That decision will most likely fall to the Congress that starts in January, and Bay Area residents can tell their members which they want.

Members of Congress as of October 2026:

CountyMembers of Congress (district)
San FranciscoNancy Pelosi (CA-11), Kevin Mullin (CA-15)
San MateoKevin Mullin (CA-15), Sam Liccardo (CA-16)
Santa ClaraSam Liccardo (CA-16), Ro Khanna (CA-17), Zoe Lofgren (CA-18), Jimmy Panetta (CA-19)
AlamedaLateefah Simon (CA-12), Aisha Wahab (CA-14), Ro Khanna (CA-17), Mark DeSaulnier (CA-10)
Contra CostaMark DeSaulnier (CA-10), John Garamendi (CA-8), Josh Harder (CA-9)
All 5Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff

San Francisco elects Pelosi’s successor on Nov. 3, and that member, not Pelosi, will vote on the next transfer. The House has a lookup by address for anyone unsure of their district.

The transit tax passes with a simple majority of votes cast across the 5 counties on Nov. 3.

The charts are generated by this code, which lists every input and its source.